Apple To Announce New Macs At October 27 Event

Apple

On Wednesday, Apple sent invites to media for an Oct. 27 event, which will be held at the company&;s Cupertino campus. The only official hint at what&039;s to come is this: “Hello again.” But Apple is expected to announce a long-awaited refresh to its Mac line of desktop computers and laptops.

Sources familiar with Apple tell BuzzFeed News that an all-new, thinner MacBook Pro and an iMac update will be unveiled at the event.

In August, Bloomberg reported that a MacBook Pro with a secondary touchpad at the top of the keyboard, a more powerful iMac, and a MacBook Air with USB-C could be announced. No word on whether a new Mac mini or Mac Pro is in the pipeline.

The MacBook Air, MacBook Pro with Retina, and iMac received minor internal updates in 2015, and the MacBook was updated earlier this year. The design of the MacBook Pro has not changed since 2013. The Air remains the only Mac in the line-up without a Retina display.

It&039;s safe to say that if you&039;re thinking about buying a new Mac, hold off until after next week&039;s news.

Twitter: @max_read / Via buyersguide.macrumors.com

BuzzFeed News&039; coverage of the fall hardware event begins at 10 a.m. on Oct. 27.

Quelle: <a href="Apple To Announce New Macs At October 27 Event“>BuzzFeed

Mark Zuckerberg Defends Peter Thiel In Leaked Facebook Post

Mark Zuckerberg has taken to his preferred social network to defend longtime board member and early Facebook investor Peter Thiel.

Responding to “concerns about Peter Thiel as a board member and a Trump supporter,” Zuckerberg wrote in an internal Facebook post, presumably this week, “We can&;t create a culture that says it cares about diversity and then excludes almost half the country because they back a political candidate. There are many reasons a person might support Trump that do not involve racism, sexism, xenophobia, or accepting sexual assault. It may be because they believe strongly in smaller government, a different tax policy, health care system, religious issues, gun rights or any other issue where he disagrees with Hillary.”

Zuckerberg&039;s full post is below. Facebook confirmed its authenticity to BuzzFeed News.

Image via boingboing.net / Via boingboing.net

The “Zhang” in the top right corner has not been identified. BuzzFeed News has reached out to the people who liked the post for comment.

Zuckerberg&039;s remarks recall what Sam Altman, president of Y Combinator and a friend of Thiel&039;s, told BuzzFeed News on Sunday: “It is possible to simultaneously maintain the positions that I think Trump would be absolutely terrible — the most unfit candidate I have ever seen from a major party to be president — and also that the right thing to do with people who disagree with you is not to shun them and cut off ties.”

Quelle: <a href="Mark Zuckerberg Defends Peter Thiel In Leaked Facebook Post“>BuzzFeed

Airbnb To Prevent Hosts In Some Cities From Listing Multiple Homes

During a conference call today, Airbnb announced plans to directly police illegal activity on its platform.

Starting November 1, Airbnb hosts in San Francisco and New York City will be unable to list more than one home on the platform. Listing multiple homes has been banned by legislation in both of these cities, but those prohibitions have proved hard to enforce. This is the first time Airbnb has changed the way its platform is engineered in order to assist with regulation.

Airbnb critics in high-rent cities like New York and San Francisco have long argued that some hosts are renting out to tourists multiple units that could otherwise be rented out affordably to residents of those cities, thereby driving up housing costs.

“If you build this into the front end,” said Airbnb head of global policy Chris Lehane Wednesday morning, “the problem takes care of itself.”

Starting November 1, hosts will go through “a rigorous process where we figure out who you are,” said Lehane on the conference call. Airbnb did not go into further specifics about how this process works.

In an email, a spokesperson from anti-Airbnb interest group ShareBetter said the change is “a tacit acknowledgement by Airbnb that they&;re dominated by commercial operators with multiple listings who are stealing our supply of affordable housing and they&039;re finally admitting it&039;s a problem.”

In a memo released Wednesday morning, Airbnb also made other policy proposals specific to New York hosts, including a three-strikes policy for hosts who break the rules, a revenue sharing scheme in which landlords of multi-unit buildings could use some of the profit from tenants hosting Airbnb guests to cover maintenance costs, and a “simple, streamlined registration system” built by Airbnb, rather than by the city.

These suggestions from Airbnb come just as New York Governor Andrew Cuomo is weighing whether or not to veto a bill that would heavily regulate short-term renting, including fines of up to $7,500 on individual hosts. The offers made by the company on Wednesday follow an aggressive ad campaign opposing that bill, as well as threats by Airbnb to sue the state of New York. The company has already sued San Francisco, Anaheim, and Santa Monica over similar regulatory issues.

It’s not yet clear whether Airbnb plans to make similar changes to its product outside of New York and San Francisco. It’s also not clear whether and how hosts will find new ways to circumvent the rules.

These won’t be the only changes to the platform going into effect on November 1. According to a report on discrimination on Airbnb published in September, all Airbnb users “will be asked to affirm and uphold the Airbnb Community Commitment before they book or share their space on the Airbnb platform.” According to the report, users who don’t agree with the discrimination policy will will be booted from the site starting November 1. Other features — including an email survey sent to guests who are denied rooms and online anti-bias training — are set to launch the same day.

Governor Cuomo has until October 29 to veto the short-term rental bill.

Quelle: <a href="Airbnb To Prevent Hosts In Some Cities From Listing Multiple Homes“>BuzzFeed

T-Mobile Fined $48 Million For Hidden Limits On Unlimited Data Plans

Eduardo Munoz / Reuters

If you’re covered by an unlimited data plan from T-Mobile, you may have been led to believe that the service you’ve purchased is faster than what you truly receive, according to the Federal Communications Commission, the nation’s telecommunications regulator. As a result, T-Mobile will be forced to pay $48 million in fines and consumer benefits to settle an investigation into the way the company conveys what “unlimited data” actually means.

According to the FCC, T-Mobile failed to make clear to its customers that its unlimited plan includes restrictions on speed and data. Under its policies, T-Mobile can throttle the internet service of its customers who use the most data each month, but the FCC found that this information wasn’t properly shared with customers through ads and disclosures, depriving these people of the real internet speeds that were marketed to them. Based on complaints from T-mobile and MetroPCS customers who felt misled, the internet slow-down policy left their services “unusable’ for many hours each day,” which limited their access to the internet, and runs counter to transparency rules on adequate disclosure.

“Company advertisements and other disclosures may have led unlimited data plan customers to expect that they were buying better and faster service than what they received,” the FCC found. T-Mobile “failed to adequately inform its ‘unlimited&; data plan customers that their data would be slowed at times if they used more than 17 GB in a given month.”

As part of the settlement, eligible T-Mobile and MetroPCS customers will be offered 4 GB of additional data if they’re covered by the “Simple Choice Mint” plan and a 20% discount off of phone accessories. The company will also be forced to provide free tablets to public school students as part of a 4-year initiative to close the “homework gap,” totaling at least $5 million.

To address what the FCC concluded were inadequate disclosures to customers, T-mobile will now clearly define who may be affected by these slow-downs and notify them when they near the 17 GB threshold. And when the company markets its services, it must either remove the term “unlimited,” spell out the restrictions that come with those plans, or stop throttling its customers.

“Consumers should not have to guess whether so-called ‘unlimited’ data plans contain key restrictions, like speed constraints, data caps, and other material limitations,” FCC Enforcement Bureau Chief Travis LeBlanc said in a statement. “When broadband providers are accurate, honest and upfront in their ads and disclosures, consumers aren’t surprised and they get what they’ve paid for.”

When asked for comment on the settlement, a T-Mobile spokesperson directed BuzzFeed News to a tweet sent by CEO John Legere.

Quelle: <a href="T-Mobile Fined Million For Hidden Limits On Unlimited Data Plans“>BuzzFeed

Anti-Defamation League Study Shows “Significant Uptick” In Anti-Semitic Twitter Abuse

A graph from the ADL&;s study showing spikes in anti-Semitic harassment on Twitter.

ADL

Harassment and abuse on Twitter is rampant. In recent years, the platform has become a primary destination for trolls and hate groups. And as the election season reaches its final stretch, the social network can feel increasingly toxic to women and minority groups. Today, a recently published report by the Anti-Defamation League offers some hard data that suggests Twitter is growing more and more anti-Semitic and increasingly hostile toward journalists.

The report — which spans nearly one year from August 2015 to July 2016 — monitored the anti-Semitic targeting of journalists throughout the current Presidential race. The study found roughly 2.6 million anti-Semitic tweets, creating more than 10 billion impressions across the web. Of those tweets, 19,253 were directed at journalists.

“The words that show up most in the bios of Twitter users sending anti-Semitic tweets to journalists are &039;Trump,&039; &039;nationalist,&039; &039;conservative,&039; &039;American&039; and &039;white.&039;”

The ADL report shows that during the study&039;s time frame, at least 800 journalists were the target of an anti-Semitic tweet. Distribution was far from even, with the top 10 most targeted journalists receiving 83% of the abusive, anti-Semitic tweets. According to the ADL, the harassment it charted was carried out largely by a vocal minority. The report found that just 1,600 Twitter accounts generated 68% of the anti-Semitic tweets aimed at journalists during this time period.

ADL

The report was commissioned by the ADL after a series of conversations with journalists who&039;d noted an uptick in anti-Semitic harassment on Twitter. “Historically this kind of bigotry is not tolerated in the mainstream, but we were really starting to hear a pattern from journalists about a growing hate taking place on Twitter specifically,” Jonathan Greenblatt, the CEO and National Director of the ADL, told BuzzFeed News. “50 years ago, people were saying this sort of stuff while hiding behind white hoods — now they&039;re hiding behind smartphones and keyboards.”

Most concerning to the ADL is the chilling effect hate speech targeted at journalists might have on the freedom to report and investigate. “We&039;re hearing from some journalists that they&039;re self-censoring and not writing particular stories for fear of repercussion of harassment,” Greenblatt said, noting that roughly 60 percent of the anti-Semitic abuse came in direct replies to journalists&039; tweets. “We&039;ve also heard from journalists considering leaving the profession because of the degree of invective, which they didn’t see as part of their job description.”

According to the report, the increase in anti-Semitic abuse toward journalists corresponds with mounting toxicity of the Presidential race, and provides “evidence that a considerable number of the anti-Semitic tweets targeting journalists originate with people identifying themselves as Trump supporters, &039;conservatives&039; or extreme right-wing elements.”

The ADL&039;s report explicitly cautions that its findings do not imply that Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump or the conservative party have endorsed hate speech. That said, a number of identifying factors suggest the current presidential election has inspired an increase in anti-Semitic abuse on Twitter. “The words that show up most in the bios of Twitter users sending anti-Semitic tweets to journalists are &039;Trump,&039; &039;nationalist,&039; &039;conservative,&039; &039;American&039; and &039;white,&039;” the ADL explains. The report shows spikes in anti-Jewish invective on Twitter during key moments in the election, like on February 29, 2016, when Trump initially refused to disavow the Ku Klux Klan.

The release of the ADL report comes as criticism of the mainstream media has taken on a markedly darker tone in recent weeks. Over the weekend, Trump repeatedly accused the media of rigging the election against him. And last week, a CNN reporter expressed his anxiety after he found a sign at a Florida rally that said “MEDIA” with a Swastika next to it. “We&039;re already seeing this spread into the real world and mainstreaming in a way we’ve never seen in our over-100-year history as an organization,” Greenblatt said.

According to the ADL, of the 1,600 Twitter accounts the group found to be most abusive, 21% were suspended during the course of its study. Greenblatt told BuzzFeed News that the ADL is in constant communication with Twitter and other big tech companies (last year it worked with Twitter and others on best practices for responding to cyber hate), and suggested that, considering journalists are doxxed, swatted, and threatened on a regular basis, there&039;s a great deal of work to be done.

“This is not just an ADL problem or a Twitter problem. It’s everyone’s problem,” Greenblatt said.

The ADL plans to issue a set of recommendations for curbing anti-Semitic abuse on Twitter in November. In the meantime, the micro-blogging service will no doubt turn a closer eye to its problem with harassment; this week multiple reports suggested that both Salesforce and Disney opted not to pursue acquisition bids for Twitter, citing worries about trolls and abuse.

Quelle: <a href="Anti-Defamation League Study Shows “Significant Uptick” In Anti-Semitic Twitter Abuse“>BuzzFeed

Here's How Much You Should Actually Earn (According To Glassdoor)

Via Flickr: 14936293@N03

Glassdoor is putting its trove of user-reported salary data to use with a new tool that estimates an employee’s “market value.” Called Know Your Worth, the tool relies on a combination of personal information — including location, industry, education level, and years of experience — as well as the local demand for labor. It then spits out an estimated dollar amount workers can reasonably expect to earn at that moment in a given market.

The tool, which is available in beta as of Tuesday night, is powered by several million salary reports and over four million job postings, is supposed to give Glassdoor users a sense of where they stand in comparison to peers with similar levels of experience.

It also compares this figure to average pay for people in your position, and provides a chart showing how market value for workers of your experience in your location has changed over time.

BuzzFeed News calculated market value for a small group of people contacted via Twitter and Facebook prior to the tool’s beta release.

“I know I’m underpaid,” said a 26-year-old project manager working for a tech company in New York City. She earns a base salary of $95,000 a year, but Know Your Worth suggested her market value was more like $108,000. Though the tool only confirmed suspicions she already had, it could serve another purpose, she said. “I would definitely bring this into a negotiation.”

In Chicago, a project manager at a startup also making $95,000 a year echoed her sentiment, saying he plans to bring this Glassdoor data into a salary negotiation later this week. “It&;s always a bit unsettling to see it presented so badly: You are making less money than you should be. That being said, I knew I was a bit below market,” he said. “Seeing it just output like that with only a comparatively small amount of information needed from me is pretty neat&;”

Others were more surprised by the results they received. According to Glassdoor, a 26-year-old male software engineer at Uber in San Francisco with two years of experience and a bachelor’s degree from Stanford is worth more than $140,000 a year. Given these results, an engineer who is actually making $128,000 a year said he “knew the base salary was less than market, but that is a more substantial difference than I expected.” He, too, said the data from Glassdoor could play a role in future salary negotiations.

Know Your Worth was less helpful for those in less straightforwardly corporate jobs For example, a microbiologist with a doctorate working for the USDA in the Bay Area and earning $70,000 a year was surprised to find his market value was actually lower than what the government was paying him. “I had figured I was more underpaid in order to work on what I value. But it turns out, I&039;m not worth shit,” he said. “I know if I left my research job to do strictly data stuff, I&039;d be worth much more.”

Other highly educated workers felt Glassdoor’s tool underestimated their potential earnings. For example, according to Glassdoor, a thirty-year-old public defender with a law degree from Harvard earning $60,000 a year in the Bronx, has a market value of around $108,000. But she says the tool wasn’t as useful as word of mouth. Plenty of the lawyers she graduated with are already making $160,000, she said, which she knows “because in law school, all everyone talks about is the starting salary at law firms.”

Glassdoor’s new tool was also ineffective for people who aren’t traditionally employed. For example, a 35-year-old Marriage and Family Therapist who charges clients $150 an hour in a private practice was unable to get any results from Know Your Worth. Glassdoor said that the tool should work for someone who is self-employed, but did say, for now, it won’t work for a freelancer who works multiple jobs for multiple employers. “Our goal in future iterations of the tool is to take into account even more information to help all people and give them even more personal information,” said Corporate Communications Director Scott Doboroski via email.

Of course, Know Your Worth is only as strong as the data Glassdoor receives, which means people in certain jobs might not be able to get an accurate quote. The company says its data set is constantly being updated, and that those who don’t find it useful can still make sense of the more basic Salary Explorer feature.

Glassdoor says know your worth will continue to learn over time as new data enters the system, and employees can sign up for regular updates as conditions develop.

Quelle: <a href="Here&039;s How Much You Should Actually Earn (According To Glassdoor)“>BuzzFeed

Clinton Camp Considered Tim Cook, Bill Gates For Veep

Reuters

Hillary Clinton&;s campaign chairman John Podesta included Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates and Apple CEO Tim Cook in a list of possible vice presidential candidates, according to an email released Tuesday by WikiLeaks.

Podesta said in the March 2016 email that he organized the possible candidates into “food groups.” The candidates with careers in politics—the bigger portion of the group—were largely grouped by their ethnicities, but the tech executives were among a group of prominent businesspeople that included Starbucks CEO Howard Shultz, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation co-founder Melinda Gates, Michael Bloomberg, and Xerox CEO Ursula Burns. Senator Bernie Sanders was at the bottom of the list in a “food group” all his own.

Over the past several days, Wikileaks has released emails from the account of John Podesta, the Clinton campaign chairman. The US government, in a statement last week, blamed Russia for a series of hacks on Democratic Party officials, stating, “the recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts.”

The full text of the email is below:

Quelle: <a href="Clinton Camp Considered Tim Cook, Bill Gates For Veep“>BuzzFeed

Samsung Is Setting Up Galaxy Note7 Recall Stations In Airports

After all US airlines banned passengers from bringing the recalled Galaxy Note7 phone on planes, Samsung has installed stations in high-traffic airports where Note7 owners can turn in their phones for a refund or replacement.

Samsung recalled the Note7 after reports of the phones&; batteries smoking and exploding, most notably on a Southwest Airlines flight that was forced to land. Last week, the Federal Aviation Administration and the Department of Transportation warned that passengers who attempt to sneak phones onto planes could face criminal charges.

A Samsung spokesperson said that the booths would be at “some of the most frequently visited airports around the country,” but it did not provide a list. Passengers at less highly trafficked airports have been forced to throw away their Note7s, according to ABC News. According to the Verge, Samsung has set up booths in Australia, South Korea, and the US.

In a prepared statement, Samsung recommended that Note7 owners visit local carriers to exchange the phone or obtain a refund before traveling. A spokesperson said airport reps are for “last-minute travel support.”

A Samsung representative on the recall hotline did not have an estimate for how many phones had been returned at airports thus far. She said that Samsung was operating at the “top 20 American airlines with a minimum of five representatives per airport.” She also said that Samsung would recommend that customers take the full refund for the Note7 rather than “downgrade to the Galaxy S7 or S7 Edge.” Many wireless carriers are offering exchanges.

Samsung released the Note7 in August 2016. But after nearly 100 reports that the smartphone was overheating and exploding, the company issued a recall for the 1.9 million phones sold and offered replacements in conjunction with the US Consumer Product Safety Commission. Consumers then reported that these replacements were overheating as well—one of the replacements even grounded a Southwest Airlines flight. The CPSC and Samsung then recalled all replacement phones, prompting the Department of Transportation and the Federal Aviation Administration to ban the phone from all flights. Experts estimate that there are still one million Note7s in circulation and that many owners are ignoring the recall warnings.

Here&039;s the Samsung&039;s spokesperson&039;s statement in full:

“All Galaxy Note7 owners should visit their local carrier or retail store and participate in the U.S. Note7 Refund and Exchange Program immediately and before traveling. We are coordinating with various partners to communicate the U.S. Department of Transportation’s recent order to ban all Galaxy Note7 devices in carry-on and checked baggage on flights across multiple touch-points. We are providing support to Galaxy Note7 owners by exchanging their devices or refunding them in a wide range of places, including at some of the most frequently visited airports around the country. These on-site reps are there to help customers with last minute travel support and can be located by calling the Galaxy Note7 hotline at 1-844-365-6197. But we urge all Galaxy Note7 owners to exchange their device or obtain a refund before they arrive at their airport. We know this is an inconvenience to our customers but their safety has to remain our top priority.”

Quelle: <a href="Samsung Is Setting Up Galaxy Note7 Recall Stations In Airports“>BuzzFeed

Ecuador's President Endorsed Clinton Ahead Of Julian Assange Losing His Internet

Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa

Ronaldo Schemidt / AFP / Getty Images

Two weeks before Julian Assange accused the Ecuadorian government of cutting his access to the internet, the country&;s president made a surprise endorsement — casting his lot with Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.

Assange, who has been living in the Ecuadorian embassy in London since 2012, has been using his Wikileaks site to publish thousands of hacked emails, most recently from the email of Hillary Clinton&039;s campaign chief John Podesta. The White House has said that at least some of the emails, those from the Democratic National Committee, were obtained by Russian state hackers.

On Monday, Wikileaks said on Twitter that Ecuador cut off Assange&039;s access to the internet over the weekend, “shortly after publication of Clinton&039;s Goldman Sachs speeches.”

Shortly after, Wikileaks alleged that US Secretary of State John Kerry had asked Ecuador to stop Assange from publishing Clinton documents. (An op-ed published Tuesday on state-run outlet Russia Today followed suit, suggesting a “potential US cyberattack” had taken down Assange&039;s internet.)

In a statement, State Department spokesperson John Kirby denied the allegations. “Reports that Secretary Kerry had conversations with Ecuadorian officials about this are simply untrue,” Kirby said in a statement to BuzzFeed News. “Period.”

Some have accused Assange of actively agitating against Clinton, including releasing his own medical records shortly after Clinton fell ill at a September 11th memorial ceremony.

The common thread between Wikileaks&039; possible connection with Russian hackers and Russian President Vladimir Putin&039;s clear preference for Republican nominee Donald Trump have also raised eyebrows. Assange has refused to reveal his sources.

But in a little-noticed Sept. 30 interview, Ecuador&039;s President, Rafael Correa, told Russia Today&039;s Spanish-language outlet that an electoral win for Clinton would be preferable for the US and the world.

“I want Hillary, whom I know and appreciate greatly, to win,” Correa said.

He went on to say, however, that Latin America “would be better off with Trump. When did progressive governments get to power [in Latin America]?… With Obama or with Bush?”

Julian Assange

Steffi Loos / AFP / Getty Images

The US-educated leader&039;s relationship with the United States has been strained for years. This summer, Correa accused the CIA of financing opposition politicians in Ecuador. In 2009, he ordered the withdrawal of US troops from a military base in the coastal city of Manta. The decision to host Assange in 2012 did not help matters.

An employee at the Ecuadorian embassy in London said authorities in Ecuador had instructed them to tell journalists that they would not answer questions and to refer them to a press release. Foreign Ministry authorities “ratify that the protection given [to Assange] by the Ecuadorian State will continue while the circumstances that led to the granting of asylum remain,” the release said.

Ecuadorian Ambassador Carlos Abad Ortiz did not reply to a request for comment on what was the cause of the internet outage at the embassy.

Quelle: <a href="Ecuador&039;s President Endorsed Clinton Ahead Of Julian Assange Losing His Internet“>BuzzFeed

Meet The Trump Movement's Post-Truth, Post-Math Anti–Nate Silver

On March 9, 2016, Mitt Romney was sitting on one of Jimmy Kimmel’s purple crushed-velvet chairs just trying to be a good sport. “This one’s from a Trump supporter,” Kimmel said as Romney accepted a stack of note cards full of PG-13 tweets calling the former Republican presidential nominee a loser. Through a pained smile, Romney read the contents of the card for the audience at home: “Donald Trump is trying to pull America back from the brink and freakin&; Mitt Romney is playing with matches in the bathroom.” Romney paused a beat, flashing a tired Jim Halpert-esque smile to the camera that’s all but become our national facial expression this election cycle, and shook his head. “I’m not touching that, I’ll tell you that.”

The bit dredged up a few nostalgic laughs and would make the rounds the next day on cable news. But the real effect was felt 3,000 miles away in a house in suburban Charlotte, North Carolina, in the Twitter mentions of a 56-year-old executive recruiter named Bill Mitchell. It had been Mitchell’s tweet that Romney read aloud, and though it was after midnight on the East Coast, his phone lit up as his 20,000 followers giddily tweeted him; the Kimmel shout-out was, as the Donald might put it, “big league.” It didn’t matter that the segment was as much about laughing at the impotent vitriol of the anonymous tweeters as it was at Romney; for Mitchell, the bit was proof of concept: It was fine if people were laughing at him as long they were paying attention.

Seven months later, Bill Mitchell — or @mitchellvii, as he&039;s known on Twitter — has more than quadrupled his audience. Tweeting an average of 270 times per day, he has arguably become Donald Trump’s most unrelenting social media surrogate. Despite Trump&039;s leaked tax returns and sexual assault allegations, Mitchell isn’t just unwavering in his support, but increasingly certain of his candidate’s chances, gunslinging 140-character projections like this one into the world every few minutes:

Mitchell has become this cycle’s mascot for a specific strain of poll-unskewing, conspiracy-theorist Trump supporter — earnest enough in his mistrust of modern electoral data and disdain for basic math that many have suspected @mitchellvii is perhaps a parody account. A few of his greatest hits:

But Bill Mitchell is no performance artist and, should you meet him, he’ll tell you that unprompted. “Oh, people think this is a parody account? Well, I have 90,000 followers and a blue check, so explain that,” he told me over a recent Skype interview. (Mitchell wouldn&039;t do in-person interviews for “security reasons,” suggesting “there are those on Team Hillary who do not wish me well.”) Where many of Trump’s most visible surrogates appear worn down, hateful, or actual card-carrying bigots, @mitchellvii is an eternal optimist, hardly ever curses, and stays largely away from the language of the alt-right.

And as Trump continues to distance himself from his party and even his advisers, his increasingly paranoid message is beginning to sound like one long @mitchellvii tweetstorm. But unlike Trump&039;s operatives and surrogates, Mitchell has no campaign ties and no professional reputation to lose. He’s just a guy tweeting from his home office and, arguably, the only person alive who will come out of the 2016 presidential campaign better than he started it.

“Oh, people think this is a parody account? Well, I have 90,000 followers and a blue check, so explain that.”

Glancing at his Twitter bio page, you’d think Bill Mitchell has been around the conservative talk pundit scene for ages. His face is long, with a head of well-styled silver hair and an intense jawline and bushy eyebrows that arch at a cartoonish pitch. Alongside his headshot, his bio boasts that his show, YourVoice™ Radio, is “a number one political talk show.” No matter that the show is hosted on a DIY podcasting platform and has only a few thousand listeners per episode. “Everyone seemed to assume he was some sort of somebody — like, a longtime local radio guy or whatever,” one reporter told me when I asked if he knew where Mitchell came from.

Mitchell&039;s radio show, which streams on YouTube.

In truth, Mitchell’s only qualification seems to be that he just started tweeting a lot. “I’ve always been clever with words,” he said. “As a recruiter, I make my living as a communicator. I’m good with word images and painting pictures with a short phrase here and there that people can relate to.” When asked how much time he spends crafting his tweets, he dismissed the idea that there’s too much forethought. “I’m just firing the thoughts out as I come to them. I have an interesting take, you see. I delve into the internals and really tell people what’s going on and it’s given me some fame.”

“I’m good with word images.”

Mitchell believes he’s been able to tap into a powerful demographic of disenfranchised, underrepresented voters who feel the country is on the wrong track and in need of a savior. “These are the people who call into Rush Limbaugh who hold on the line and never get on the air. My tweets caught on because I was saying out loud and using my talent for words to say what they wanted.” According to Mitchell, he’s averaging 40,000 retweets and 10 million Twitter impressions each day.

Mitchell&039;s appeal makes sense — he&039;s one of them. Like his audience, he&039;s quick to indulge a good conspiracy theory and subscribes to a media diet free of “mainstream bias,” reading Breitbart, Conservative Treehouse, DC Whispers, the Gateway Pundit, and the occasional Drudge article. He doesn’t check mainstream sites and networks like CNN or MSNBC because “it’s all spin to me.” For a growing number of Americans who’ve defined themselves online by adding “Deplorable” to their Twitter handle, @mitchellvii is a beacon in a growing storm of bad news — a kind of post-truth, post-math Nate Silver. For everyone else, the account is an almost anthropological look at Trumpism at its most simple-minded.

Mitchell&039;s executive recruiting business website.

When we spoke, Mitchell was fighting off a nasty flu he&039;d picked up around the same time that leaked footage from Access Hollywood showed Trump bragging about groping and kissing women. But rather than let it sideline him, Mitchell saw his fever and laryngitis as a kind of divine test. “They say that opportunity knocks at inopportune times and that’s why so many people don’t live out their dreams,” Mitchell told me. “I won’t lie to you, this is fun. I’m on a mission.”

To hear Mitchell tell it, that mission started around the time he was 10 years old, putting up signs in his neighborhood for Nixon. He’s a lifelong Republican but didn’t find the spark until he watched Ross Perot run as an independent presidential candidate in 1992. For Mitchell, who’s run his own business for decades, the idea of a businessman in the White House just seemed to make sense. And in June 2015, he got his wish with Donald Trump. “Around then I was an armchair quarterback with only 100 Twitter followers,” he said. “But when he decided to run, that’s when I decided to jump in.”

Screenshots of Mitchell&039;s Yahoo&; Answers activity.

Traces of Mitchell’s online presence from before he took his Trump oath of allegiance reveal an exceedingly average middle-aged man. He&039;s unmarried and has no kids. He graduated of the University of Maryland in 1982 and now runs an executive recruiting business, ExecutiveDecision.biz, which touts his “bold, pro-active style” that “empowers clients to acquire the finest staff on target, on time, every time.” His Yahoo Answers profile, stretching back more than a decade, paints a fuller picture. Across hundreds of questions and answers, Mitchell reveals a successful recovery from colon cancer, a frequent desire for feedback on whether or not to color his graying hair, and endless mundane curiosities ranging from the silly (“Why do Jack Russell owners all look like the [sic] want to kill themselves?” “Would a bumble bee the size of a man be able to fly?”) to the more existential (“What is intuition and how often is it correct?” “Why don&039;t they create a condom that covers just the top inch of your penis?”).

When he talks about polls, Mitchell’s friendly voice lowers considerably to the cadence of a condescending Little League coach. Mitchell’s take is that the polls are skewed to further silence Trump and the silent majority as a result of oversampling and overweighting Democrats. Get him going on the subject and he’ll argue that scientifically random polls conducted via landlines aren’t actually scientific or random, given the response rates; that the margins of error and small sample size tend to disqualify the national polls; and that major media polls don’t take into account built-in bias and key X factors — a favorite of Mitchell’s is “enthusiasm,” which Mitchell often calculates via tweets, yard signs, and rally sizes (Trump’s are YUGE, while Hillary struggles to put together a crowd of 200, he contends).

While in previous years this contempt for math would be roundly dismissed by all except the far fringes, today Mitchell’s message is inexplicably of the moment, casting the armchair tweeter in a different light. In a perfect world, Mitchell said, he would like to see polls abolished altogether — although he believes unscientific polls conducted via survey embeds on sites like the Drudge Report do a decent job capturing that elusive metric of enthusiasm. “If you arrived here from Mars today and you didn’t speak English but you saw Trump every single day of the week at these rallies — he’s dominating online, he’s dominating yard signs and rallies and all the physical things we can see. You’d think, This guy is winning. If it were up to me I’d make polling illegal. This is just my dream world.”

“The prize for the dumbest motherfucker on the internet goes to Bill Mitchell. This is a guy who’s proud of the fact that he doesn’t understand math.”

Pollsters and political operatives seem to agree that he’s living on a different plane of existence.

“The prize for the dumbest motherfucker on the internet — and there’s lots of competition this cycle — goes to Bill Mitchell, who’s way out ahead of the field,” Republican strategist Rick Wilson said when I asked him about Mitchell’s brand of punditry. “In the course of my 20-year career I’ve commissioned hundreds of surveys from presidential polling to state house races,” Wilson said, through intermittent, heavy sighs. “I’ve consumed a lot of polling and this is a guy who’s proud of the fact that he doesn’t understand math.”

Pollster Frank Luntz routinely takes shots at Mitchell on Twitter, calling into question Mitchell’s basic understanding of statistics. When Mitchell infamously tweeted this summer, “imagine polls don’t exist. Show me evidence Hilary is winning?” FiveThirtyEight’s Nate Silver had a laugh at his expense, tweeting, “Imagine there&039;s no polls/ It&039;s easy if you try/ No Pew or Quinnipiac/ On crowd size we rely.” Both Luntz and Silver did not respond to multiple requests to comment on Mitchell&039;s polling views.

Republican pollster Kristen Soltis Anderson — who recently had Mitchell’s “groundgame is in our hearts” tweet made into a ceramic coffee mug — is perhaps as charitable toward Mitchell as any statistician could possibly be. For her part, she understands the skepticism, driven by historical and recent polling misses like the Brexit vote. “He says in 140 characters the most absolutely perfect nonsense that anyone with any understanding can dismantle entirely,” Anderson says. “But we’re living in a post-fact environment. And If you don’t like the polls, having somebody who tells you they’re wrong makes you feel good.”

Becoming the laughingstock of the Washington establishment does not appear to trouble Mitchell. “I’m making all the right enemies,” he said. “You know you’ve made it on Twitter when famous people are trolling you. Frank Luntz trolls me all the time and I enjoy when they troll me. I enjoy the battle of wits.”

“I’m making all the right enemies.”

Despite Mitchell’s retweet-happy followers, his influence, even inside the Trump-supporting fringe conservative media sphere, is unclear. Before starting his homemade podcast, Mitchell was a frequent guest on the Wayne Dupree Show, a conservative podcast with a Cleveland AM radio following. Mitchell left the show abruptly under mysterious circumstances. (He has tweeted the departure was friendly and that he wanted to strike out on his own; Dupree didn&039;t wish to comment on the departure.)

Though he’s been retweeted three or four times by Trump himself, Mitchell claims he has no direct contact with the campaign and that no money has ever changed hands in return for his tens of thousands of on-message tweets. He suggested he’s in touch with a number of individuals close to the campaign and believes that the distance is “by design, so that I can remain an independent voice.” But one conservative media source suggested that Mitchell’s outsider status might have more to do with ego issues.

“He thought he was going to be in charge of a Trump group in North Carolina months ago and when he got there, he found out he wasn&039;t and left, deciding not to be a part,” a source said. Mitchell plays this down, alleging that he volunteered to run social media for the campaign in North Carolina but quit after a few weeks, deciding his personal account was more helpful to the campaign. Still, one source believes there’s tension between Mitchell and the campaign, explaining that earlier this year, Trump’s adviser and social media director Dan Scavino unfollowed Mitchell after an incessant series of Twitter direct messages filled with “pointers about how wrong they were doing social media.” Scavino did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

But what&039;s in it for Mitchell? He says that the work that goes into his radio show and constant tweeting “hasn&039;t come without considerable personal financial cost.” Still, he claims he hasn’t given thought to what could come after Election Day. “I have friends on TV who say when all’s said and done I should pursue this. I have people who now, before they go on TV, they contact me and say, ‘This is what we’re talking about, what should I say?’ and I give them zingers.” Though Mitchell wouldn’t reveal the identities of his TV friends, his podcast show has hosted, among others, Trump surrogate Katrina Pierson and conservative activist James O’Keefe.

But Mitchell’s influence is considerable — earlier this year, the MIT Media Lab listed him as the 26th most influential Twitter account of this election cycle (the highest ranked non-politician or journalist), between Lindsey Graham and Megyn Kelly. But neither a politician with the constant pressure to win elections nor a journalist bound by network standards and practices, Mitchell appears to have very little at stake. He is free to tout conspiracy theories that Clinton cheated in the debates with elaborate signals and teleprompters or that polls are an irresponsible way to take the pulse of an electorate.

“Trump has been caused, in large part, by a daily war against reality, waged not just by people at Fox News, but the Breitbarts of the world and random talk radio hosts like Bill Mitchell,” former Obama speechwriter Jon Favreau told me. “Information and media consumption is so diffuse now you have all these people on the right feeding other voters lies and alternative realities on a daily basis, and Bill is one of those people.”

Mitchell, for his part, is not worried about being wrong. After all, while the so-called experts dismissed Trump’s chances throughout the primaries, Mitchell was predicting landslide defeats with his gut, which he says is his guide. “It’s better to have tried and given it 100% than to sit back and worry about it,” he said. “I do what I think is right every day and say what I believe.”

Quelle: <a href="Meet The Trump Movement&039;s Post-Truth, Post-Math Anti–Nate Silver“>BuzzFeed