Six reasons OpenStack fails (Hint: it’s not the technology)

The post Six reasons OpenStack fails (Hint: it&;s not the technology) appeared first on Mirantis | The Pure Play OpenStack Company.
We know OpenStack is hard. But why?
Earlier this month, Christian Carrasco gave a keynote address at the OpenStack Days Silicon Valley conference, discussing six factors behind OpenStack evaluation and deployment failure &; and how to solve those problems. As Cloud Advisor at Tapjoy, Carrasco is architecting a 550-million-user cloud based on both private and public resources. He also has a history as CTO of a private cloud hardware company and two other startups focused on cloud technologies, so he brought a lot of insight into the causes of failure, pinpointing six primary points of failure.
Lesson 1: Leave the dogma at home
Dogmatic views, or beliefs accepted as fact without doubt, are blinders, he explained, and they can come from a variety of sources, including bad previous experiences with technology. For example, Carrasco’s experience with OpenStack five years earlier had been a negative experience because the platform just wasn’t ready. Fast-forward five years to 2016, and it’s now rock-solid for many applications, including his.
However, if dogma had prevailed, trying OpenStack again might have been out of the running. Keep in mind, though, that rebranding old technology as new, or new technology as old, or even rebranding fake technology as its legitimate counterpart can lead to a poor experience that gets associated with that real technology. (See Lesson 5.)
Lesson 2: Fear, doubt, uncertainty, and doom (aka FUDD) can cause problems
Remember when Linux was first launched? If you do, then you probably also remember the a proliferation of scare tactics. Your world will end if you use Linux! Nothing will work! Licensing is too confusing! Cats and dogs, living together, total chaos!
OpenStack has seen the same kind of FUDD. Every year, independent publications, public entities, and skewed statistical reports predict the death of OpenStack. And yet, OpenStack keeps on keeping on, taking over the private cloud market.
Lesson 3: Find the right distribution
The third reason Carrasco covered was the “You picked the wrong trunk” scenario. The latest version of open source software such as OpenStack is called the &;trunk&;, a base repository of code. The thing about trunk is that it requires lots of tweaking and the modules aren’t always in tune with each other. Community Linux trunks can have some configurations tweaked but not all, and it still requires a level of expertise, so deploying from trunk is not for less-experienced engineers.
Lesson 4: You are not a full-stack engineer
In today&8217;s world, where personnel often have to fulfill multiple roles, many engineers are being told they have to be &8220;full-stack engineers.&8221;
Carrasco, who has worked the full stack and still says he’s not a full-stack engineer, believes full-stack engineers are myths, and he makes a great argument for his belief. It’s really hard to be a full-stack engineer, he says, because you have to be proficient in every realm of the stack &8212; and it&8217;s not just the software. Just being proficient in software stack is difficult, but when you throw in the hardware side, as well as networking, security, and so on, being an expert in everything is a monumental, if not impossible, task.
Organizations need to be aware of the skillset of the people leading the OpenStack deployment and be sure they&8217;ve got all of their bases covered.
Lesson 5: You thought OpenStack was a better buggy for your horse
OpenStack isn’t necessarily a better buggy, or a cheaper method of doing something, or the open source way of doing something. Carrasco says it’s more of a paradigm shift, a new methodology that is still evolving, in the way data centers operate. And the reality is that sometimes this methodology isn’t ideal for traditional businesses.
Lesson 6: You didn&8217;t have a sufficient team
While the rumotrs that you need dozens of experts to successfully deploy OpenStack is an exaggeration, you&8217;re likely going to have problems if you try to deployed it alone, or with a very small team that isn&8217;t ready to deploy data center technology.
If you need help with your OpenStack deployment, there are plenty of options available for design, architecture, and verification of your stack, from automated tools to semi- and fully-managed services.
Along the same lines, some companies aren’t really ready for OpenStack yet, and it may not be economically feasible for a small company to hire a cloud team, purchase hardware, and rack up costs.
On the other hand, some companies lend themselves well to deployment, such as companies that were born online, are making the move to online, or are ready to stop using buggies and be committed and engaged to moving to the next generation of .
OK, so what do I do about it?
Carrasco offers two major solutions to help prevent OpenStack deployment failure.
The first thing Carrasco asks companies he advises is &8220;Where is your Cloud Officer?&8221; If you’ve made a multi-million dollar investment in your cloud and it’s a side project of some other team in your company, that&8217;s not a recipe for success. “What happens to clouds that become orphaned?” he asks. “They become security risks. They become a headache. Nobody wants to work with them, and they vanish,&8221; he says. There needs to be real ownership for your cloud to succeed, and a Cloud Officer will protect your cloud, prevent vendor lock-in, and bring the cloud in line with the organization’s initiatives.
The second solution he suggested is all about vendors. Despite the open nature and coopetition of OpenStack, according to Carrasco, the status quo consists of both public and private vendors fiercely guarding their territory and coming up with creative ways to lock users into their service or their cloud technology, etc., and few companies are creating ways to enable outside operability.
Carrasco’s ultimate vision for a solution is to adopt what he calls a hyper-converged cloud. In this architecture, you have your cloud and your assets powered by multiple vendors &8212; whoever you want to choose to power your cloud. This structure has an added advantage of opening possibilities for niche providers of services not offered by private or public clouds.
The point is not about technology, but about people being able to own their assets. Carrasco is instituting this concept successfully now at Tapjoy, but for this concept to work, interoperability standards are key. Oh, and to those who’d say it’s late for standards, Carrasco points to market research that shows cloud technology is still a tiny speck on the radar when compared to the market share of other tech industries.
So stop trying to make a better buggy, Carrasco says, and focus on making the next-generation cloud.
You can see the entire speech on the OpenStack Days Silicon Valley website.
The post Six reasons OpenStack fails (Hint: it&8217;s not the technology) appeared first on Mirantis | The Pure Play OpenStack Company.
Quelle: Mirantis

Report: IBM public cloud empowers developers

The latest edition of Forrester Research’s Forrester Wave report which evaluates global public cloud platforms characterized IBM as a “strong performer” in public cloud. IBM earned “the highest possible score for its private and hybrid cloud strategy as well as the top ranking for IBM’s infrastructure services,” eWeek reports. Forrester’s study used 34 evaluation criteria [&;]
The post Report: IBM public cloud empowers developers appeared first on Thoughts On Cloud.
Quelle: Thoughts on Cloud

People in Los Angeles Are Getting Rid Of Their Cars

Pete Saloutos / Getty Images

Eric Spiegelman grew up in a six-car family in the San Fernando Valley and has lived in Los Angeles for the majority of his life. At the end of May, he let the lease on his Volkswagen CC expire, opting to live car-free in a city synonymous with car culture. For the past three months, he&;s been commuting to and from work exclusively via Uber and Lyft — mostly using Pool and Line, cheaper options that allow passengers to share trips with other riders on similar routes.

“It ran so contrary to the culture that I’d been brought up in, and also my sense of what was doable,” Spiegelman, 39, told BuzzFeed News. “It was the most unnatural feeling thing at first. But it was so freeing.”

An understandable sentiment — after all, Spiegelman is president of the LA Taxicab Commission.

Spiegelman had been studying the economics of riding Uber and Lyft versus a taxi or driving a personal vehicle when he decided to run the math for his own car. He made a spreadsheet outlining the cost of leasing his Volkswagen: $458 monthly for the lease itself, $158 for insurance, $70 for gas, and at least $72 for parking, for a total cost of about $758. Based on those calculations, he said he has saved more than $1,100 in the last three months, spending an average of $3.42 for each UberPool or Lyft Line ride to work in August.

Ride-hail companies are betting that in the future — particularly after the introduction of self-driving cars — owning a car will become a thing of the past. LA, a city long known for car dependency, sprawl, and gridlock, has become a proving ground for this shift. More than a half-dozen Angelenos told BuzzFeed News they have ditched their cars recently and instead rely on Uber, Lyft, public transportation, bikes, and, for longer trips, ZipCar, Turo or similar services. And they’re part of a growing movement that’s slowly reshaping the Autopia that is LA.

“If you think about it, the ideal form of public transportation for LA is cars on demand.”

There were nearly 6.3 million cars registered in Los Angeles County from January through December 2015, according to the California Department of Motor Vehicles. Nearly 73% of workers ages 16 and older in LA County drove to work alone in 2014, according to the most recent US Census Bureau data, and 67% in the city of LA. Residents complained in an LA Times poll conducted in September that traffic is their biggest concern. LA drivers spent 81 hours each sitting in traffic in 2015, more than drivers in any other US city, according to the transportation analytics company Inrix.

“LA, that confluence of sort of an extremely high dependence on cars, a lack of public transportation, does in fact make it very well suited to transition more rapidly to Uber or Lyft,” said Arun Sundararajan, a New York University professor and author of a book called The Sharing Economy. “If you think about it, the ideal form of public transportation for LA is cars on demand.”

Interstate 405

Kevork Djansezian / Getty Images

Lyft has grown 25-fold in LA since January 2014, the company told BuzzFeed. Line, the cheaper ride-sharing option it introduced in LA in September 2014, now accounts for 30% of rides. Derek Kan, Lyft’s general manager for LA, said the “vast majority” of wait times are under 3 minutes, and that the highest-volume passengers in the city take up to 200 rides a month.

Uber, which provides more than 150,000 rides in LA per day, has seen similar popularity for Pool. About five months after Lyft launched Line in LA, Uber launched UberPool. That ride-sharing service now accounts for 25% of trip requests.

“I was actually surprised by how well Angelenos have adopted UberPool,” Brian Hughes, Uber’s general manager for that market, told BuzzFeed. “We knew as we were launching UberPool that we were asking for a significant change in behavior from the Los Angeles population.”

It helps that rides can be dirt cheap. Compare the base UberX fares for several cities: $2.55 in New York City, $2 in San Francisco, $1.15 in Washington, DC, and $1.70 in Chicago, according to Uber’s fare estimator. And the minimum fares: $8 in New York City, $6.55 in San Francisco, $6.35 in Washington, DC, and $4.20 in Chicago.

In LA, the base fare for UberX is $0; the minimum fare is $5.15. The per-minute rate is 15 cents and the per-mile rate is 90 cents, lower than the corresponding rates for the other cities, except Chicago, which has the same per-mile rate.

For UberPool and Lyft Line rides, which are shared with other passengers, the cost goes down even further.

Uber Wait Times in Los Angeles

Uber Wait Times in Los Angeles

Courtesy of Uber

On average, choosing to share a ride with UberPool only adds about 4.2 extra minutes to a rider’s trip, Hughes said. But Uber found that LA riders were nervous that getting in a car with another passenger would make them late. After finding that was a concern in other markets as well, Uber added “you’ll arrive by” estimates to its app.

If there’s anything as frustrating as driving in LA, it’s parking there: The city issues more than 2.5 million parking citations each year, raking in $165 million. Christian Nurse, a 36-year-old commercial and music video producer who lives in the Fairfax District, had been living in LA for about 14 years by the time Uber launched there in 2012. He was sick of all the parking tickets that regularly collected on his Jeep Wrangler’s windshield.

A parking lot in Los Angeles.

Michael H / Getty Images

“Having a car in LA is a giant pain in the ass. You’re always worried about it,” Nurse said “It’s this giant expensive thing that you constantly need to be aware of when you’re in it, when you’re not in it.”

Nurse did the math and realized even if he rode Uber everywhere, it would cost him about the same amount as owning a car. So he sold the Jeep.

“I tell people I live in LA like it’s New York. Uber and Lyft are my public transit station.”

“I tell people I live in LA like it’s New York. Uber and Lyft are my public transit station,” he said. “Before ride-sharing, I wasn’t really taking taxis everywhere. It’s not like calling a taxi, and you have to give them your address, and they’re dispatched out, and they’re more expensive.”

It’s worth noting that this is a relatively new phenomenon. In December 2014, when the Transportation Sustainability Research Center at the University of California, Berkeley, asked LA residents about their usage of Uber and Lyft, they didn’t feel the same way.

“The focus group … told us that they use Uber and Lyft periodically for commutes and for other trips, but that they did not use it, they would not sell a vehicle, they would not rely upon it on a daily basis because of surge pricing and the uncertainty of trip costs,” said Adam Cohen, a research associate for the center who focuses on Southern California. “It would be good to get a reassessment on that now.”

But that was just a few months after Lyft Line launched, and before the debut of UberPool and the companies’ price wars to win market share.

Whether Uber and Lyft have made a significant dent on parking congestion in LA is unclear. Donald Shoup, an urban planning professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, who has studied parking in the city, said riding Uber and Lyft round-trip is generally cheaper than owning a car and paying to park it in LA. But he said it’s difficult to determine if it’s made finding parking any easier, or rates cheaper in garages. Uber approached him to ask whether he had studied if the company’s services reduced vehicle travel or parking demand, but he said he didn’t have the evidence to answer the question.

There’s one area where Uber and Lyft have had a much more noticeable impact: They’ve decimated the taxi industry.

There’s one area where Uber and Lyft have had a much more noticeable impact: They’ve decimated the taxi industry. The number of LA taxi trips dropped 30% from 2012, when Uber and Lyft began operating there, to 2015. Unlike in New York, where without promotional rates Uber and Lyft could cost the same amount as a yellow cab, taxis are notoriously expensive in LA. For example, a ride between Universal Studios and Melrose Avenue would cost about $11 in UberX or Lyft, according to Ride Guru, a fare comparison website. A taxi for the same route would run about $23. A ride from Los Angeles International Airport to Universal Studios would cost $84 in a taxi, or $38 in an UberX or Lyft.

The city itself has also been attempting to get people out of their cars. LA is working toward a 20-year plan, approved by the city council last year, to improve public transportation and safety for pedestrians and bicyclists, and reduce the number of miles traveled by vehicle. Claire Bowin, a senior planner for the city, told BuzzFeed News that while the mobility plan had been in the works for years, the increasing popularity of Uber and Lyft have created a turning point. Before, she said, it was difficult to tell people that not owning a car in LA could ever be an option.

“By introducing Uber and Lyft into that equation, you’ve introduced that other option for people,” Bowin said. “There&039;s a comfort level. I’m not in a bus with 30 other people or having to walk and get sweaty carrying my groceries.”

LA Metro opened up the Expo Line, a light rail between downtown LA and Santa Monica, in May as part of its effort to wean people off car ownership. When it began running, Uber ran a promotion for $5 off Pool rides to or from Expo line stations. For ride-hail companies, partnering with public transportation agencies to market themselves as companion services can increase mutual ridership. Kan, Lyft’s LA general manager, said three of the top 10 destinations for Lyft rides are metro stations.

Ashton Dunn, a 33-year-old strategy director in advertising, said he was intrigued by the city’s move to make public transportation and biking more viable options for LA residents. To test whether he could survive without owning a car, he put himself on a two-month experiment in which he biked, hailed rides, and carpooled. Dunn sold his 2009 Honda Civic, which he estimates cost him about $100 weekly, on July 23. Now he spends $50-$60 on Uber and Lyft every week and bikes 10 miles to and from work.

“I was spending so much time inside of a car and I was absolutely sick of driving. This is not how I want to spend my life, in a car. No thanks,” Dunn said. “I feel free.”

Quelle: <a href="People in Los Angeles Are Getting Rid Of Their Cars“>BuzzFeed