Why Silicon Valley Is Censoring Itself As It Expands In India

Aaron Fernandez for BuzzFeed News

For a Bollywood movie, Gaurav Dhingra's Angry Indian Goddesses was decidedly un-Bollywood. There were no song-and-dance sequences, no lavish weddings, and no bankable superstars whisking away leading ladies. Instead, there was swearing, lots of sexual innuendo, and a lesbian engagement.

Or at least there was — until India’s Central Board of Film Certification had its way with the film. The government agency stripped Dhingra’s feminist drama of its sexual innuendos and replaced all the “fucks” with loud bleeps.

Dhingra was furious. He and Pan Nalin, the film’s director, protested the film’s censorship on primetime talk shows and social media. And shortly after the movie hit theaters in December 2016, they posted uncensored clips of everything that had been cut from the official release on the film’s Facebook page.

It was right around then that Netflix came calling. Netflix wanted to buy global streaming rights to the uncensored “international version” of Angry Indian Goddesses. It would stream in more than a hundred countries  — expletives and all. Dhingra and Nalin were ecstatic. They signed the deal.

Then, days before the film went live on Netflix in India in April, the streaming service called again. It had changed its mind. “We were told that India streaming has been delayed because they needed to stream the same version which was theatrically released in India,” Nalin told BuzzFeed News. He did not divulge any more details, but sources familiar with the deal say that the next few days were fraught with tension. “[The filmmakers] were counting on Netflix as a place where people could finally watch their film as they intended it to be watched,” said the source. “But Netflix refused to budge.” In the end, the filmmakers gave in. Angry Indian Goddesses made its “fuck”-free debut on Indian Netflix in April even as the rest of the world saw it uncut.

But “after many, many hours on the phone with the producers,” according to sources familiar with the situation, Netflix changed its mind yet again. At the end of June, it replaced the censored version of the movie with the international version in India. “Fans reached out to us [about the movie] and we are listening,” a Netflix spokesperson told BuzzFeed News. “What happened with Angry Indian Goddesses was a miss.”

Netflix may have relented, but it’s an exception among Silicon Valley companies, which often censor their products in India. In the world’s largest democracy, Amazon Prime Video cuts most nudity and profanity from its content, Google bans retailers from buying ads for erotica, Amazon and Flipkart refuse to sell adult products, and Tinder positions itself as a brand that parents approve of. Selling adult products, watching nudity online, and casual dating aren’t illegal in India. But Silicon Valley is playing it extra safe, and its attempts to not offend some Indians are alienating others.

“Western companies trying to expand in India are being overcautious because of the huge investments they are making in the country,” Prithwiraj Mukherjee, professor of marketing at the Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore, told BuzzFeed News. “They don’t want to risk offending anyone’s sentiments in a diverse country like India.”

The country is a crucial market for Silicon Valley: There are now more internet users in India than there are people in the United States — and millions more will come online in the next few years. But as American tech companies pour billions into the country, they’re fumbling as they attempt to appeal to India’s already-online, Snapchat-savvy, English-speaking, Beyoncé-listening, urban millennials, while also trying to win over the country’s comparatively conservative millions.

Amazon Prime Video launched in India in December 2016, and was immediately blasted by angry Indian customers on Twitter for proactively censoring many TV shows and movies, including its own productions like Transparent. Worse, the censorship was arbitrary. Some nudity, like a sex scene a couple of minutes into the pilot of Transparent, was blurred out. In another instance, Amazon chopped one episode of its car show, The Grand Tour, in half to remove a plotline involving a car made of animal carcasses with a windshield of cow innards, presumably to avoid offending religious Hindus, who consider cows sacred. But most of Californication, a series well-known for its gratuitous nudity, survived Amazon’s airbrushing.

“It’s just ridiculous,” José Covaco, a popular Indian comedian who has been a vocal critic of Amazon Prime Video censorship, told BuzzFeed News. “I am an adult that pays Amazon to watch this stuff.”

Amazon has also managed to piss off India’s indie filmmakers, like director Qaushiq Mukherjee. Mukherjee’s controversial cult film Gandu (“Asshole”), which features explicit frontal nudity and was banned from Indian theaters in 2011, does stream on Indian Netflix. (Despite its flip-flop over Angry Indian Goddesses, Netflix stands apart from Amazon Prime because it promised not to censor its content in India.) But Mukherjee doesn’t really have other options for his film. “I would never consider Amazon Prime [because of censorship],” Mukherjee told BuzzFeed News. “I haven’t even watched stuff on Amazon for that reason.”

Nobody wants bad PR or government ire in an important market over a little nudity or a dead cow.

Amazon’s proactive censorship has no legal basis in India. Last year, India’s Ministry of Information and Broadcasting explicitly clarified that the country’s government has no power to censor content on the internet, nor is it planning to frame any regulations to do so.

Despite this, Amazon doesn’t seem to have any plans to pull back its censorship in India. At an Amazon event held in New Delhi in April, Nitesh Kripalani, Amazon’s head of Prime Video in India, told BuzzFeed News that the reason Amazon censors content in India is because it has a “responsibility to balance customer preferences and Indian cultural sensibilities.” Amazon did not respond to BuzzFeed News’ questions on the topic despite multiple requests.

“I don’t think these companies want to risk drawing negative attention to themselves,” said Mukherjee.

There’s precedent for this. Large companies have, at times, abruptly found themselves the target of the wrath of angry Indians for unwitting missteps. In January, Indians were outraged when they found out that Amazon Canada was selling doormats with an Indian flag design (touching things with one’s feet is considered disrespectful in India). Amazon did, eventually, remove the doormats, but not before India’s external affairs minister angrily tweeted about rescinding visas issued to Amazon officials in India.

Twitter: @SushmaSwaraj

Twitter: @SushmaSwaraj

And in April, thousands of furious Indians left Snapchat one-star ratings in the App Store because of disrespectful comments about India that the company’s CEO had allegedly made.

That’s why companies expanding in India err on the side of caution — nobody wants bad PR or government ire in an important market over a little nudity or a dead cow.

“Silicon Valley companies entering India really, really do not want to spend time and money battling frivolous controversies that could needlessly hurt their brands,” said a person who works at Amazon Prime Video in India who did not wish to be named. “We just don’t want to take any risks.”

For a site that sells pasties and penis pumps, Lovetreats.in looks remarkably tasteful — a cross between Etsy and a gift guide in a glossy magazine. The Bangalore-based startup is one of half a dozen that launched in the country in the last few years to cash in on urban India’s newfound taste for sex toys. Business has been great. Lovetreats has grown nearly 30% every month for the last year and a half, its cofounder Balaji T.V. told BuzzFeed News. But here’s what’s holding him back: He’s not allowed to register as a seller on two of India’s largest e-commerce platforms — Amazon and Flipkart — to sell his products.

Indian regulations do not allow massive e-commerce websites with multiple sellers, like Amazon and Flipkart, to own their own inventory, which means that all online retail business in the country is driven entirely through third-party sellers. According to a press release, Amazon doubled the number of sellers on its platform in India since July 2016, to 200,000. But popular Indian adult product startups like Lovetreats and MasalaToys aren’t allowed on Amazon — which is ironic for a company whose vision statement once said that it wanted to be a place where people could come to “find and discover anything they might want to buy online.”

Amazon’s policies for sellers in India explicitly state that “‘adult-only’ items that are primarily sold through adult-only novelty stores and erotic boutiques are not permitted,” without specifying the reason for the ban. In contrast, Amazon’s policies for selling adult products in the United States are clear and granular, separating items into toys and games, bondage gear, fetish wear, sensual products, and “sexual furniture” like sex swings, ramps, and cushions. A casual search for “vibrators” on Amazon US throws up more than a hundred pages of results. Flipkart, which operates only in India, doesn’t list any policies for adult products on its site, but searching for adult products doesn’t show any results.

“I could see my business growing eight to ten times if I could sell on Amazon India and Flipkart,” said the cofounder of a popular Indian adult products website, who requested anonymity.

“For companies like Amazon, the sex toys market in India is a small, high-risk one.”

Flipkart did not respond to BuzzFeed News’ requests for comment. An Amazon spokesperson responded to BuzzFeed News’ questions around its policy with a single sentence: “Sellers are prohibited from selling these products on Amazon.in.” The spokesperson did not respond to a follow-up question: “Why?”

The sellers that BuzzFeed News spoke to all said that large e-commerce companies, especially Western companies like Amazon that are pumping in money to expand in India, don’t want to risk violating the country’s obscenity laws, which prohibit graphic imagery on packaging and marketing materials.

Companies have been sued over sex toys; in 2015, for instance, a lawyer in New Delhi took Indian e-commerce startup Snapdeal to court for selling vibrators on its platform. But the case was thrown out. There is no law in India that explicitly forbids anyone from buying or selling sex toys, as long as the packaging isn’t graphic.

“For companies like Amazon, the sex toys market in India is a small, high-risk one,” said a seller who did not wish to be named. “When we sell these things on our own websites, we are extremely careful [about] not violating India’s obscenity laws. You’ll never find anything objectionable in our packaging and presentation. But I think a brand like Amazon wouldn’t want to get in trouble with a rogue seller on its platform.”

Still, big e-commerce sites seem to recognize the appetite for adult products in India. Multiple sellers told BuzzFeed News that both Amazon and Flipkart had reached out to them to explore the possibility of selling some of the “softer stuff,” as one seller put it. “They said that we could try selling handcuffs, but no vibrators, blow-up dolls, or anything hardcore,” this seller told BuzzFeed News. “But eventually, the discussions fizzled out. I guess they chickened out.” Amazon and Flipkart did not respond to requests for comment about this.

Being banned from India’s largest e-commerce platforms isn’t the only thing that hamstrings adult product sellers. They are also banned from buying keywords and display ads from Google, the world’s largest advertising company.

India is one of 19 countries where Google doesn’t sell adult ads, according to Google’s advertising policies page. Google told BuzzFeed News that it is simply complying with India’s obscenity laws. “Based on an assessment of prevailing legal and regulatory requirements, at present, we do not allow adult products or toys to be advertised in India,” a Google spokesperson said.

But sellers of adult products argue that this policy shouldn’t prevent them from advertising things like lingerie and scented candles on Google. In one instance, a seller who did not wish to be named told BuzzFeed News that he fought a losing battle with Google’s sales reps for nearly eight months before giving up. “They told me that even though my ad was for lingerie, the website that it linked back to sold hardcore stuff, so they couldn’t let me buy ads,” he said. Google did not respond to BuzzFeed News’ requests for comment on this.

Admittedly, some Western tech companies don’t censor or restrict their products proactively in India. But they still struggle when confronting conservative Indian mindsets.

Daljeet Singh Virdi is a middle-aged Airbnb host in the Indian city of Pune. He has offered a bright, airy bedroom in his spacious apartment on the platform for over a year. It’s good for business travelers, says Virdi, and solo adventurers, and married couples. The “married” bit is crucial.

“If you look like a young couple, I ask that you prove to me that you’re married,” Virdi told BuzzFeed News. “You can either show me a marriage certificate, or maybe a common address [as] proof to show that you live with each other in the same house.”

Dozens of listings that BuzzFeed News viewed on Airbnb India in the last month had a “married couples only” policy. “Most requests I used to get were from couples who weren’t married to each other,” said Kaniska Bhattacharya, an Airbnb host from Kolkata who has listed his property on the platform for nearly a year. “You can call me conservative, but look, me and my family are really not into letting unmarried couples live with each other.”

Dozens of listings that BuzzFeed News viewed on Airbnb India in the last month had a “married couples only” policy.

Quelle: <a href="Why Silicon Valley Is Censoring Itself As It Expands In India“>BuzzFeed

SW271: Benq bringt HDR-Display mit 10-Bit-Panel

Mit dem kleinen 4K-UHD-Monitor SW271 stellt Benq einen Monitor vor, der sich vor allem für Fotografen eignen soll. Das Display bietet einen hohen Dynamikumfang, feine Farbauflösung und kann per USB Typ C betrieben werden. Besonders hell ist das Profimodell allerdings nicht. (Display, HDR)
Quelle: Golem

EWII TRIPL: Hermes testet Elektrodreirad für Paketzustellung

Der Paketzusteller Hermes erprobt in Göttingen mit dem EWII TRIPL ein Elektromobil mit drei Rädern. Das Gefährt verfügt über einen 750 Liter großen Laderaum und kann in verkehrsbeschränkten Innenstädten fahren. Konkurrent Deutsche Post baut gar eigene Elektrolieferwagen und Fahrräder. (Elektroauto, Technologie)
Quelle: Golem

Tuning for Zero Packet Loss in Red Hat OpenStack Platform – Part 1

For Telcos considering OpenStack, one of the major areas of focus can be around network performance. While the performance discussion may often begin with talk of throughput numbers expressed in Million-packets-per-second (Mpps) values across Gigabit-per-second (Gbps) hardware, it really is only the tip of the performance iceberg. The most common requirement is to have absolutely stable and deterministic network performance (Mpps and latency) over the absolutely fastest possible throughput. With that in mind, many applications in the Telco space require low latency that can only tolerate zero packet loss.
In this “Operationalizing OpenStack” blogpost Federico Iezzi, EMEA Cloud Architect with Red Hat, discusses some of the real-world deep tuning and process required to make zero packet loss a reality!

Packet loss is bad for business …
Packet loss can be defined as occurring “when one or more packets of data travelling across a computer network fail to reach their destination [1].” Packet loss results in protocol latency as losing a TCP packet requires retransmission, which takes time. What’s worse, protocol latency manifests itself externally as “application delay.” And, of course, “application delay” is nothing more than a fancy term for something that all Telco’s want to avoid: a fault. So, as network performance degrades, and packets drop, retransmission occurs at higher and higher rates.  The more retransmission the more latency experienced and the slower the system gets. With increased packets due to this retransmission we also see increased congestion slowing the system even further.

Tune in now for better performance …
So how do we prepare OpenStack for Telco? 
Photo CC0-licensed (Alan Levine)
It’s easy! Tuning!

Red Hat OpenStack Platform is supported by a detailed Network Functions Virtualization (NFV) Reference Architecture which offers a lot of deep tuning across multiple technologies ranging from Red Hat Enterprise Linux to the Data Plane Development Kit (DPDK) from Intel.  A great place to start is with the Red Hat Network Functions Virtualization (NFV) Product Guide. It covers tuning for the following components:

Red Hat Enterprise Linux version 7.3
Red Hat OpenStack Platform version 10 or greater
Data plane tuning

Open vSwitch with DPDK at least version 2.6
SR-IOV VF or PF

System Partitioning through Tuned using profile cpu-partitioning at least version 2.8
Non-uniform memory access (NUMA) and virtual non-uniform memory access (vNUMA)
General OpenStack configuration

Hardware notes and prep …
It’s worth mentioning that the hardware to be used in achieving zero packet loss often
Photo CC0-licensed (PC Gehäuse)
needs to be latest generation. Hardware decisions around network interface cards and vendors can often affect packet loss and tuning success. For hardware, be sure to consult your vendor’s documentation prior to purchase to ensure the best possible outcomes. Ultimately, regardless of hardware, some setup should be done in the hardware BIOS/UEFI for stable CPU frequency while removing power saving features.

Setting
Value

MLC Streamer
Enabled

MLC Spatial Prefetcher
Enabled

Memory RAS and Performance Config
Maximum Performance

NUMA optimized
Enabled

DCU Data Prefetcher
Enabled

DCA
Enabled

CPU Power and Performance
Performance

C6 Power State
Disabled

C3 Power State
Disabled

CPU C-State
Disabled

C1E Autopromote
Disabled

Cluster-on-Die
Disabled

Patrol Scrub
Disabled

Demand Scrub
Disabled

Correctable Error
10

Intel(R) Hyper-Threading
Disabled or Enabled

Active Processor Cores
All

Execute Disable Bit
Enabled

Intel(R) Virtualization Technology
Enabled

Intel(R) TXT
Disabled

Enhanced Error Containment Mode
Disabled

USB Controller
Enabled

USB 3.0 Controller
Auto

Legacy USB Support
Disabled

Port 60/64 Emulation
Disabled

BIOS Settings from:

Open vSwitch with DPDK
KVM4NFV Test Environment

Divide and Conquer …

Properly enforcing resource partitioning is essential in achieving zero packet loss performance and to do this you need to partition the resources between the host and the guest correctly. System partitioning ensures that software resources running on the host are always given access to dedicated hardware. However, partitioning goes further than just access to hardware as it can be used to ensure that resources utilize the closest possible memory addresses across all the processors. When a CPU retrieves data from a memory address it first looks at the local cache on the local processor core itself. Proper partitioning, via tuning, ensures that requests are answered from the closest cache (L1, L2 or L3 cache) as well as from the local memory, minimizing transaction times and the usage of a point-to-point processor interconnection bus such as the QPI (Intel QuickPath Interconnect). This way of accessing and dividing the memory is defined as NUMA (non-uniform memory access) design.
Tuned in …
System partitioning involves a lot of complex, low-level tuning. So how does one do this easily?
You’ll need to use the tuned daemon along with the the accompanying cpu partitioning profile. Tuned is a daemon that monitors the use of system components and dynamically tunes system settings based on that monitoring information. Tuned is distributed with a number of predefined profiles for common use cases. For all this to work, you’ll need the newest tuned features. This requires the latest version of tuned (i.e. 2.8 or later) as well as the latest tuned cpu-partitioning profile (i.e. 2.8 or later). Both have are available publicly via the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.4 beta release or you can grab the daemon and profiles directly from their upstream projects. 
Interested in the latest generation of Red Hat Enterprise Linux? Be the first to know when it is released by following the official Red Hat Enterprise Linux Blog!

However, before any tuning can begin, you must first decide how the system should be partitioned.
Based on Red Hat experience with customer deployments, we usually find it necessary to define how the system should be partitioned for every specific compute model. In the example pictured above, the total number of PMD cores – one CPU core is two CPU threads – had to be carefully calculated by knowing the overall required Mpps as well as the total number of DPDK interfaces, both physical and vPort. An unbalanced PMD number versus DPDK ports will result in lower performance and interrupts which will generate packet-loss. The rest of the tuning was for the VNF threads, excluding at least one core per NUMA node for the operating system.

Looking for more great ways to ensure your Red Hat OpenStack Platform deployment is rock solid? Check out the Red Hat Services Webinar Don’t fail at scale: How to plan, build, and operate a successful OpenStack cloud today! 

Looking at the upstream templates as well as in the tuned cpu-partitioning profile, there is a lot to understand about the specific settings that are executed on each core per NUMA node.
So, just what needs to be tuned? Find out more in Part 2 where you’ll get a thorough and detailed breakdown of many specific tuning parameters to help achieve zero packet loss!

The “Operationalizing OpenStack” series features real-world tips, advice and experiences from experts running and deploying OpenStack.
Quelle: RedHat Stack

This Rural Canadian Community Is Scared Amazon Will Cut Them Off

David Ryder / Getty Images

Think you're obsessed with Amazon Prime? People living in Iqaluit, Canada actually depend on it.

Canada's CBC News reports that people in Iqaluit, which is the capital of the extremely remote Nunavut territory, say that Amazon Prime's goods and food staples are far more affordable than what they can buy anywhere else.

Iqaluit is on an island, accessible by daily jets from Montreal and Ottawa, both roughly 1,200 miles away. Travel by boat is tenuous because of sea ice, and many residents use snowmobiles to get around.

People living in the 7,700-person town say Prime does more for them than even the Canadian government assistance program Nutrition North. The company's subscription service gives people access to free two-day shipping on eligible goods in Amazon's online store as well as to streaming video via Amazon Prime video. It costs $79 USD per year.

Goods at Iqaluit stores are often extremely expensive due to the cost of shipping items to the remote region. According to CBC News, a box of 180 diapers costs $70 off the shelf; the same thing is only $35 on Amazon Prime. Prime allows residents to save a fair amount of money.

Though many people in Iqaluit say that Prime makes their lives better, there is still a large swath of the population that can't afford the service, Wade Thorhaug of Qayuqtuvik Society, Iqaluit's sole soup kitchen, told the CBC.

Here's where Iqaluit is:

Google Maps / Via google.com

Residents of Iqaluit say they live in fear that Amazon will cut off free shipping to their town because of how expensive it is, as it did in 2015 with much of the rest of the territory.

Much like when Wal-Mart leaves rural communities, the loss of Amazon Prime could be devastating, residents said, because of how much more they would have to spend on basic necessities like deodorant and groceries.

CBC news compared the prices of groceries in Iqaluit to those on the mainland in a June 24 article:

  • $6.90 for one kilogram of carrots in Iqaluit that was $2.25 on the mainland.
  • $13.70 for a five kilogram bag of flour, $5.00 on the mainland
  • $6.05 for a tube of toothpaste, $2.61 on the mainland

But residents are hoping that Iqaluit's high volume of orders per person will persuade Amazon to continue offering free shipping to the town. CBC reported that Iqaluit's post office is one of the busiest in the country, processing 88,500 packages, or 12 per Iqaluit resident, in the first five months of 2017.

According to Amazon, here's what qualifies as “postal codes that are difficult to serve” in Canada:

  • Towns far from a shipper's hub

  • Towns that are infrequently served by shippers

  • Canada Post Air Stage Locations (where mail must be airlifted at certain times of the year)

Only standard shipping is available in these remote locations, and Amazon said on its site to “please allow an additional 2-5 days for delivery to these locations.”

Amazon did not respond to requests to comment.

Amazon Is Lowering The Price Of Prime For People On Government Assistance

Quelle: <a href="This Rural Canadian Community Is Scared Amazon Will Cut Them Off“>BuzzFeed