<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cloud Computing Köln &#187; n63</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.cloud-computing-koeln.de/tag/n63/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.cloud-computing-koeln.de</link>
	<description>Neues zu Cloud Computing, Internet of Things und Technologien</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 02:41:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>de-DE</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>OpenStack Developer Mailing List Digest December 10- 16</title>
		<link>https://www.cloud-computing-koeln.de/openstack-developer-mailing-list-digest-december-10-16-2/</link>
		<comments>https://www.cloud-computing-koeln.de/openstack-developer-mailing-list-digest-december-10-16-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 22:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[da Agency]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenStack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8217]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[n63]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloud-computing-koeln.de/openstack-developer-mailing-list-digest-december-10-16-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Updates Release schedule clarification after Ocata [5] Nova placement/resource providers [6][12] Stuart McLaren stepping down from glance core [8] Allowing Teams Based on Vendor-specific Drivers (cont) [1] Narrowed down options at last TC meeting to following [2]: Soft black (option 2): default option, had no negative feedback, represents the current status quo Soft white (option&#8230; <a class="more-link" href="https://www.cloud-computing-koeln.de/openstack-developer-mailing-list-digest-december-10-16-2/">Continue reading &#8594;</a></p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.cloud-computing-koeln.de/openstack-developer-mailing-list-digest-december-10-16-2/">OpenStack Developer Mailing List Digest December 10- 16</a> erschien zuerst auf <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.cloud-computing-koeln.de">Cloud Computing Köln</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Updates</p>
<p>Release schedule clarification after Ocata [5]<br />
Nova placement/resource providers [6][12]<br />
Stuart McLaren stepping down from glance core [8]</p>
<p>Allowing Teams Based on Vendor-specific Drivers (cont) [1]</p>
<p>Narrowed down options at last TC meeting to following [2]:</p>
<p>Soft black (option 2): default option, had no negative feedback, represents the current status quo<br />
Soft white (option 4): had some positive feedback, folks liked it&amp;<a class="expresscurate_contentTags" href="http://www.cloud-computing-koeln.de/tag/8217/">#8217</a>;s simple solution<br />
Grey (option 5): had the most positive feedback, but also the least amount of detail</p>
<p>Other options’ patches are being abandoned<br />
Leaning towards an amended version of the ‘Grey’ proposal [10]</p>
<p>Community Goals for Pike (cont.) [3]</p>
<p>Need feedback [4]<br />
Keep using openstack/governance for documenting goals</p>
<p>Make sure to include guides<br />
Consider prioritization as it may not be possible to complete all the goals in the release<br />
Think about splitting larger goals to things that can be accomplished in a single release</p>
<p>Involving users/operators through the Product WG and start face to face discussions on the Forums</p>
<p>Python changes in OpenStack CI [7]</p>
<p>Python3.4 on a Trusty VM for older branches: stable/liberty and stable/mitaka<br />
Python3.5 on a Xenial VM for newer branches: stable/newton and master</p>
<p>Python3.4 testing is disabled for these<br />
ACTION:</p>
<p>Projects should enable voting for Python3.5 jobs or add them if they don’t exist yet<br />
Projects should remove Python3.4 jobs if they run only on master</p>
<p>Golang Technical Requirements [15]</p>
<p>Activities to adopt Go into OpenStack are ongoing<br />
Areas need more discussion</p>
<p>Common Libraries<br />
Dependency Management</p>
<p>Candidates are govendor, glide and godep</p>
<p>Release Deliverables</p>
<p>Tags and/or build artifacts?<br />
AUTHORS and ChangeLog files can be autogenerated</p>
<p>Oaktree has golang bindings and contains generated files</p>
<p>Upgrade readiness check in Nova [11]</p>
<p>New, separate service<br />
Checks the system state and indicates how much it is ready to start the Ocata upgrade (success, warning, error)</p>
<p>Self-service branch management [13]</p>
<p>Through openstack/releases repo<br />
Specify your needs in a patch [14] and the rest is automated after it’s merged<br />
New stable branch creation is best to happen close to the end of the cycle, when the bug fixing and stabilization activities are slowing down</p>
<p>Architectural discussion about nova-compute interactions [16]</p>
<p>How do Nova, Neutron and Cinder interact with nova-compute<br />
Should nova-compute become a standalone shared service? [9]</p>
<p>&nbsp;<br />
[1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-November/108074.html<br />
[2] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2016/tc.2016-12-06-20.02.log.txt<br />
[3] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-November/108167.html<br />
[4] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/community-goals<br />
[5] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-December/108689.html<br />
[6] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-December/108707.html<br />
[7] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-December/108821.html<br />
[8] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-December/108840.html<br />
[9] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/411527/<br />
[10] https://review.openstack.org/403829<br />
[11] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-December/109060.html<br />
[12] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-December/109085.html<br />
[13] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-December/108923.html<br />
[14] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/releases/tree/README.rst#<a class="expresscurate_contentTags" href="http://www.cloud-computing-koeln.de/tag/n63/">#n63</a><br />
[15] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-December/108875.html<br />
[16] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-December/109044.html<br />
Quelle: openstack.org</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.cloud-computing-koeln.de/openstack-developer-mailing-list-digest-december-10-16-2/">OpenStack Developer Mailing List Digest December 10- 16</a> erschien zuerst auf <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.cloud-computing-koeln.de">Cloud Computing Köln</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.cloud-computing-koeln.de/openstack-developer-mailing-list-digest-december-10-16-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OpenStack Developer Mailing List Digest December 10- 16</title>
		<link>https://www.cloud-computing-koeln.de/openstack-developer-mailing-list-digest-december-10-16/</link>
		<comments>https://www.cloud-computing-koeln.de/openstack-developer-mailing-list-digest-december-10-16/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 11:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[da Agency]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenStack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8217]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[n63]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.cloud-computing-koeln.de/openstack-developer-mailing-list-digest-december-10-16/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Updates Release schedule clarification after Ocata [5] Nova placement/resource providers [6][12] Stuart McLaren stepping down from glance core [8] Allowing Teams Based on Vendor-specific Drivers (cont) [1] Narrowed down options at last TC meeting to following [2]: Soft black (option 2): default option, had no negative feedback, represents the current status quo Soft white (option&#8230; <a class="more-link" href="https://www.cloud-computing-koeln.de/openstack-developer-mailing-list-digest-december-10-16/">Continue reading &#8594;</a></p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.cloud-computing-koeln.de/openstack-developer-mailing-list-digest-december-10-16/">OpenStack Developer Mailing List Digest December 10- 16</a> erschien zuerst auf <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.cloud-computing-koeln.de">Cloud Computing Köln</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Updates</p>
<p>Release schedule clarification after Ocata [5]<br />
Nova placement/resource providers [6][12]<br />
Stuart McLaren stepping down from glance core [8]</p>
<p>Allowing Teams Based on Vendor-specific Drivers (cont) [1]</p>
<p>Narrowed down options at last TC meeting to following [2]:</p>
<p>Soft black (option 2): default option, had no negative feedback, represents the current status quo<br />
Soft white (option 4): had some positive feedback, folks liked it&amp;<a target="_blank" class="expresscurate_contentTags" href="https://www.cloud-computing-koeln.de/tag/8217/" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow" >#8217</a>;s simple solution<br />
Grey (option 5): had the most positive feedback, but also the least amount of detail</p>
<p>Other options’ patches are being abandoned<br />
Leaning towards an amended version of the ‘Grey’ proposal [10]</p>
<p>Community Goals for Pike (cont.) [3]</p>
<p>Need feedback [4]<br />
Keep using openstack/governance for documenting goals</p>
<p>Make sure to include guides<br />
Consider prioritization as it may not be possible to complete all the goals in the release<br />
Think about splitting larger goals to things that can be accomplished in a single release</p>
<p>Involving users/operators through the Product WG and start face to face discussions on the Forums</p>
<p>Python changes in OpenStack CI [7]</p>
<p>Python3.4 on a Trusty VM for older branches: stable/liberty and stable/mitaka<br />
Python3.5 on a Xenial VM for newer branches: stable/newton and master</p>
<p>Python3.4 testing is disabled for these<br />
ACTION:</p>
<p>Projects should enable voting for Python3.5 jobs or add them if they don’t exist yet<br />
Projects should remove Python3.4 jobs if they run only on master</p>
<p>Golang Technical Requirements [15]</p>
<p>Activities to adopt Go into OpenStack are ongoing<br />
Areas need more discussion</p>
<p>Common Libraries<br />
Dependency Management</p>
<p>Candidates are govendor, glide and godep</p>
<p>Release Deliverables</p>
<p>Tags and/or build artifacts?<br />
AUTHORS and ChangeLog files can be autogenerated</p>
<p>Oaktree has golang bindings and contains generated files</p>
<p>Upgrade readiness check in Nova [11]</p>
<p>New, separate service<br />
Checks the system state and indicates how much it is ready to start the Ocata upgrade (success, warning, error)</p>
<p>Self-service branch management [13]</p>
<p>Through openstack/releases repo<br />
Specify your needs in a patch [14] and the rest is automated after it’s merged<br />
New stable branch creation is best to happen close to the end of the cycle, when the bug fixing and stabilization activities are slowing down</p>
<p>Architectural discussion about nova-compute interactions [16]</p>
<p>How do Nova, Neutron and Cinder interact with nova-compute<br />
Should nova-compute become a standalone shared service? [9]</p>
<p>&nbsp;<br />
[1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-November/108074.html<br />
[2] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2016/tc.2016-12-06-20.02.log.txt<br />
[3] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-November/108167.html<br />
[4] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/community-goals<br />
[5] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-December/108689.html<br />
[6] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-December/108707.html<br />
[7] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-December/108821.html<br />
[8] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-December/108840.html<br />
[9] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/411527/<br />
[10] https://review.openstack.org/403829<br />
[11] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-December/109060.html<br />
[12] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-December/109085.html<br />
[13] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-December/108923.html<br />
[14] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/releases/tree/README.rst#<a target="_blank" class="expresscurate_contentTags" href="https://www.cloud-computing-koeln.de/tag/n63/" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow" >#n63</a><br />
[15] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-December/108875.html<br />
[16] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-December/109044.html<br />
Quelle: openstack.org</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.cloud-computing-koeln.de/openstack-developer-mailing-list-digest-december-10-16/">OpenStack Developer Mailing List Digest December 10- 16</a> erschien zuerst auf <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.cloud-computing-koeln.de">Cloud Computing Köln</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.cloud-computing-koeln.de/openstack-developer-mailing-list-digest-december-10-16/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
